Skip to main content

About

[English]

I am James L. Fleming — Edinburgh-born and Edinburgh-bound, in the way that only a Scotsman fully understands. I hold a B.A. and M.A. in Asian Cultural History from the University of Edinburgh, and began, though never finished, a doctorate in the same field; family circumstances and my own health intervened, and I have since made a kind of quiet peace with that unfinished chapter.

These days I live a modest, semi-reclusive life on the outskirts of my native city, dividing my time between reading, writing, and the occasional glass of something Scottish. My particular devotion is to Korean literature — a passion that began during my university years and has only deepened with time — though I range freely across world literature more broadly, from the Russian canon of my youth to the American classics I once famously misquoted in front of a girl I was trying to impress.

This blog exists as a space for long-form essays on the books that have shaped me, written always through the lens of a Western reader who has spent a working lifetime studying Asian literary and cultural traditions. I am not a professional critic, and I claim no final authority on any of the books I discuss — only an abiding curiosity, and a willingness to be wrong in interesting ways. This space also serves, modestly, as a place for readers studying British English to encounter it as it is actually written and thought, rather than as a textbook renders it.

A note, for the curious: James L. Fleming is the name I write under. The reading behind these essays, and the opinions in them, are genuinely mine.

A further note on how these essays come to be, since I would rather be direct about it than coy: the drafting here draws on AI language tools, guided and directed at every stage, then fact-checked, edited, and signed off by a human editor before a word of it reaches you. James L. Fleming is the editorial name under which that collaboration is presented to readers — not a living person, and no biographical detail offered under it should be mistaken for a claim about a real individual.

For correspondence, you may reach me at hemingwaydynamite@outlook.kr.

'Ex Oriente, Lux.'
— James L. Fleming, Edinburgh

[한글 번역]

나는 제임스 L. 플레밍이다 — 에든버러에서 태어나 에든버러에 매여 사는, 스코틀랜드 사람만이 온전히 이해할 수 있는 방식으로. 에든버러 대학교에서 동양 문화사 학사·석사 학위를 받았고, 같은 분야로 박사과정을 시작했으나 끝맺지 못했다. 집안 사정과 나 자신의 건강이 발목을 잡았고, 나는 그 미완의 장(章)과 이제는 조용히 화해했다.

요즘은 고향 외곽에서 소박하고 반쯤 은둔에 가까운 삶을 살며, 독서와 집필, 그리고 이따금 스코틀랜드산 술 한 잔 사이를 오간다. 나의 특별한 애정은 한국 문학에 있다 — 대학 시절 시작된 이 애정은 시간이 지날수록 깊어지기만 했다 — 다만 세계 문학 전반도 자유롭게 넘나든다, 젊은 날의 러시아 문학 정전부터, 한 여학생에게 잘 보이려다 유명하게 잘못 인용했던 미국 고전까지.

이 블로그는 나를 만들어온 책들에 대한 장문의 에세이를 위한 공간으로, 언제나 평생을 아시아 문학·문화 전통 연구에 바친 서구 독자의 시선으로 쓰인다. 나는 전문 평론가가 아니며, 내가 다루는 어떤 책에 대해서도 최종적인 권위를 주장하지 않는다 — 다만 끊임없는 호기심과, 흥미로운 방식으로 틀릴 줄 아는 태도가 있을 뿐이다. 이 공간은 또한, 소박하게나마, 영국식 영어를 공부하는 독자들이 교과서가 아니라 실제로 쓰이고 사고되는 방식 그대로의 영어를 접할 수 있는 자리이기도 하다.

궁금해할 이들을 위해 한마디: 제임스 L. 플레밍은 내가 글을 쓸 때 쓰는 이름이다. 이 에세이들 뒤에 있는 독서와 그 안에 담긴 의견들은 온전히 내 것이다.

이 에세이들이 어떻게 만들어지는지에 대해서도 한마디 더 남긴다 — 에둘러 말하기보다 정직하게 밝히는 편이 낫다고 생각해서다. 이곳의 초고는 AI 언어 도구의 도움을 받아 작성되며, 그 과정은 매 단계 사람이 방향을 정하고 지도한다. 이후 사실관계 검증과 편집을 거쳐, 사람인 편집자의 최종 승인을 받은 뒤에야 독자에게 공개된다. 제임스 L. 플레밍은 이러한 협업 과정을 독자에게 소개하는 편집상의 이름이다 — 실존 인물이 아니며, 이 이름으로 제시되는 어떠한 신상 정보도 실제 개인에 대한 주장으로 오해되어서는 안 된다.

문의는 hemingwaydynamite@outlook.kr 로 연락 주기 바란다.

'Ex Oriente, Lux.'
— James L. Fleming, Edinburgh

Popular posts from this blog

Translating Yeong-hye: Han Kang's The Vegetarian and Its Three Witnesses

The first sentence of Han Kang's The Vegetarian belongs to a husband, and in Korean it is little more than a shrug. Before his wife stopped eating meat, he says, he had never thought of her as anyone special. In Deborah Smith's English the same man remembers her as "completely unremarkable in every way", which is a harder thing to say about the person you chose to marry. I have read the two openings side by side more often than I would care to admit, and the gap between them has occupied me for years. It is not a large gap. It is the width of an adverb or two. Yet the novel is about nothing so much as the distance between what a woman is and what the people around her say she is, and on the very first page the English edition has already widened it by a notch. That English edition has had an extraordinary life. It shared the Man Booker International Prize with its author in 2016, the first year the award went to a single book and was divided equally between writer ...

The Land That Remembers: Park Kyung-ni's Toji and the Borrowed Earth of Pearl Buck

 There is a particular grief reserved for books, and I do not mean the grief of closing a good one. I mean the grief of losing one entirely — not to fire or flood, but to the far more mundane violence of removal men and cardboard boxes. When I left my university lodgings for the last time, hauling the wreckage of an unfinished doctorate back to my mother's house, an entire shelf of my collection simply vanished somewhere between Edinburgh's Old Town and the outskirts I now call home. Among the casualties was my set of Park Kyung-ni's Toji: sixteen volumes, painstakingly assembled over three years of a student's meagre stipend. I have since replaced them, of course. But the replacement copies sit on my shelf with the slightly formal air of a stepfamily; they have never quite forgiven me for losing the originals, and I have never quite forgiven myself.  I mention this because Toji is, before it is anything else, a novel about precisely this kind of loss — the loss of land...

Two Fathers, One Legend: On the Three Kingdoms, Twice Told

 I found it, as one finds most things worth keeping, entirely by accident. Tucked between a chipped hardback of Gibbon and a water-stained atlas, on a shelf in one of those narrow, book-crammed shops that still cling to the West Port here in Edinburgh, sat a single volume with no dust jacket and a title in gilt lettering so worn I had to tilt it towards the window to read it: Romance of the Three Kingdoms . The bookseller, a taciturn man who has sold me more regrettable purchases than I care to admit, glanced up and said only, "Ah. That one takes a fortnight." He was, as it turned out, being generous.  What he did not say — what almost nobody outside a handful of specialists ever bothers to say — is that the book in my hands had two fathers, and they disagreed rather violently about what sort of book it ought to be.  The first father was Chen Shou, a third-century court historian who compiled the Sanguozhi , a dry, careful, admirably unglamorous chronicle of the period. T...